Where the Nation turns for Independent, Expert Advice
Text Size
The Division The Academies
Report: Academies' FindingsLearn more about Reports >>
Understanding and Managing Risk Security Systems for the DOE Nuclear Weapons Complex (2011)

In the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Nuclear Security Administration -- a semi-autonomous agency -- is responsible for securing fully and partially assembled nuclear weapons and significant quantities of special nuclear material at facilities around the country. The U.S. Congress directed the Administration to ask the National Research Council for advice on augmenting its security approach, particularly on the applicability of quantitative and other risk-based approaches for securing its facilities. The National Research Council committee concluded that balancing cost, security, and operations at facilities in the nuclear weapons complex cannot be accomplished by assessing security risks more quantitatively or more precisely. However, using qualitative, structured thinking processes and techniques to characterize security risk could improve the Administration's understanding of security vulnerabilities and guide more effective resource allocation. Specifically, the committee identified three key shortcomings in NNSA's current security approach that could -- at least in part -- be addressed by the adoption of such processes and techniques. A "total systems approach" could better serve the interests of security by better characterizing the interactions and dependencies of security countermeasures at Department of Energy facilities.

About Reports : Academies' Findings

The division produces 60-70 reports per year. These reports are unique, authoritative expert evaluations. Each report is produced by a committee of experts selected by the Academy to address a particular statement of task and is subject to a rigorous, independent peer review. The experts who volunteer their time participating on study committees are vetted to make sure that the committee has the range of expertise needed to address the task, that they have a balance of perspectives, and to identify and eliminate members with conflicts of interest. All reports undergo a rigorous, independent peer review to assure that the statement of task has been addressed, that conclusions are adequately supported, and that all important issues raised by the reviewers are addressed. Thus, while the reports represent views of the committee, they also are endorsed by the Academy.

Materials based on Report
Get Updates!
About This Report

Primary Board:
Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board

Sponsor(s):
National Nuclear Security Administration, U.S. Department of Energy