<< All Back-issues
<< This Issue's Table of Contents
ILAR Journal V44(3) 2003
Behavioral Research Outside the Laboratory
Demands for Rhesus Monkeys in Biomedical Research: A Workshop Report1-3
| Introduction 222 |
| Summary of Recommendations 223 |
|
Workshop Presentations 224 |
| Session 1: Rhesus Resource Needs, Availability, and Limitations 224 |
| Session 2: Alternative Macaque Models for AIDS Research 225 |
| Session 3: Alternative Old World Primate Models for Non-AIDS Research 227 |
| Session 4: Alternative New World Primate Models for Non-AIDS Research 231 |
| Appendixes 236 |
| Appendix 1. Workshop Speakers and Attendees 236 |
| Appendix 2. Workshop Agenda 238 |
Introduction
As the closest phylogenetic relatives to humans, nonhuman primates play an indispensable role in biomedical research. These animals are often the best--and sometimes the only--available model for studying a variety of human health issues, ranging from diseases and disorders to potential therapies and preventive strategies. National efforts to address the medical threats of bioterrorism and reduce the prevalence of AIDS depend on scientific access to nonhuman primates.
Today, however, scientists are facing a shortage of nonhuman primates available for biomedical studies. Through the mid-1970s, the rhesus macaque could be readily imported from India, and the scientific community grew dependent on access to this laboratory animal. Today, however, rhesus macaques can no longer be imported from India. Although US breeding colonies are operating at peak capacity, scientific demand for these and other nonhuman primates exceeds the available supply.
Concerned that shortage of nonhuman primates could seriously impede scientific progress, two components of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)--the Office of AIDS Research (OAR), and the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)--have taken a lead role in addressing this issue. At the direction of US Department of Health and Human Services Secretary, Tommy G. Thompson, NIH is coordinating an effort to assess the needs for nonhuman primates in a variety of federal research agencies and is mapping out strategies to meet these needs.
To explore alternatives to rhesus macaques in biomedical research, NCRR and OAR convened a panel of investigators who utilize other nonhuman primate species in their research. The Workshop on Demands for Rhesus Monkeys in Biomedical Research, held April 19-20, 2002, at the National Academy of Sciences in Washington, DC, had three goals:
Invited speakers were each asked to address a particular topic or animal model in a 25-minute presentation. Speakers were also requested to address the following issues relative to specific animal models:
The workshop culminated in a series of recommendations intended to alleviate scientific demands for rhesus macaques, especially those of Indian origin. This report provides highlights of Workshop presentations and summarizes the Panel's recommendations and the rationale behind each.
Summary of Recommendations
The Workshop Panel on Rhesus Monkey Demands in Biomedical Research issued a series of recommendations designed to alleviate dependence on rhesus monkeys for biomedical studies. Although the majority of their suggestions focused on characterizing and enhancing access to alternative species, the Panel also addressed broader issues that limit the nation's capacity for conducting nonhuman primate research. These larger concerns include an urgent need for adequate research infrastructure--especially facilities--and the need for stable funding and long-term planning for nonhuman primate resources. Failure to provide such critical research resources may seriously jeopardize our nation's ability to protect its citizens from bioterrorism, AIDS, and other major threats to human health.
The Panel's recommendations, and a brief rationale for each, are summarized below.
Nonhuman primate resources must be in place if the biomedical community is to respond appropriately to any threats or challenges to the nation's health. Therefore, the Panel urges NIH to take steps now to ensure adequate primate resources for the future.
Workshop Presentations
Session 1: Rhesus Resource Needs, Availability, and Limitations
Dr. Jerry Robinson, National Center for Research Resources
NCRR supports a network of eight National Primate Research Centers (NPRCs), as well as additional primate resources. Combined, these NCRR-supported facilities house more than 25,000 nonhuman primates, including more than 15,000 rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and more than 4,000 baboons (Papio sp.).
Although the NPRCs are enhancing their breeding colonies to meet increased scientific demands for rhesus macaques, such efforts require years to reach fruition. The female rhesus does not become reproductively capable until 3.5 to 4 years of age, and the male at over 4 years of age.
SPF colonies. In collaboration with the NIH Office of AIDS Research, NCRR has awarded six grants (five of which went to NPRCs) to establish specific-pathogen-free (SPF) rhesus and pigtailed macaque colonies. However, it may take more than 5 years to step up production of these animals and increase their availability. Additional grants for SPF colonies are expected to be awarded later this year.
Survey of NIH Grantees. Dr. Robinson outlined the results of an NCRR-supported survey of NIH grantees who use nonhuman primates in their research. More than 1,000 scientists were polled, and 641 responded. According to the survey, an estimated 13,000 nonhuman primates were used in 1999 in NIH-funded investigations; an estimated 65% of those animals were rhesus macaques.
Two thirds of respondents do not typically use NPRC resources. Of scientists who requested access to NPRCs, 95% had their requests granted. The remaining 5% were denied access primarily because of lack of animals or lack of space.
Survey respondents gave the NPRCs high marks for quality of resources and services, but low marks for availability of animals and space. Of respondents who had used NPRC resources in 1999, 70% said they had no difficulties receiving requested materials within 1 to 3 months, and 75% did not consider animal costs unreasonable.
Recommendations that arose from the survey include:
Dr. Bonnie Mathieson, NIH Office of AIDS Research
In the mid-1980s, researchers found that isolates of SIV derived from sooty mangabeys and African green monkeys caused AIDS in rhesus macaques of Asian origin, thereby providing researchers with a model to study AIDS pathogenesis, treatment, and vaccines. At the time, rhesus macaques (mostly of Indian origin) were commonly available in the United States because they had been bred for polio vaccine testing.
Once virus genes were identified, researchers developed candidate vaccines and began testing them in rhesus and other macaque species, including pigtailed and cynomolgus macaques. Lack of standardization in macaque species, virus stocks, and outcome measures made comparisons among models difficult. Scientists began calling for a single model system, particularly for vaccine research.
The opposite approach is to develop methodologies that can be used across monkey species, such as quantitative tests to measure viral RNA copies in plasma and immunological reagents for cell surface markers and cytokines. Dr. Keith Reimann of the New England NPRC has a Web site with information about commercially available immunological reagents that can be used across species.
As scientists began exploring new concepts for preventing AIDS, the demand for macaques grew. The new field of microbicide research, for example, began to use the same macaque models as in vaccine research because the stocks for virus challenge were already titered for vaginal and rectal use in these animals.
Recently, NIAID's Division of AIDS queried its grantees about their use of macaques in 2000 and 2001. These extramural investigators indicated using about 1,400 animals in 2000 and more than 2,000 animals in 2001. Because the NPRCs at current capacity can produce only about 1,800 macaques per year, NIH grantees were forced to acquire some macaques from commercial sources.
Macaques used for AIDS research comprise less than half of those used for all biomedical research, and the demand for macaques is expected to grow as research in fields such as transplantation and bioterrorism uses more of these animals. Possible solutions include:
Session 2: Alternative Macaque Models for AIDS Research
Dr. Jon Warren, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
In a study conducted by Dr. Nancy Haigwood at the Seattle Biomedical Research Institute, SIV-infected pigtailed macaques received immune globulin purified from the plasma of an SIV-infected long-term nonprogressor macaque. The animals and controls were followed up to 3 years postinfection. Although passive vaccination led to prolonged viral suppression and doubled the mean time to disease, it did not lead to viral clearance, and most vaccinated animals still developed simian AIDS (SAIDS). Because some animals developed SAIDS and died despite having had prolonged suppression of plasma virus, the researchers concluded that viral load was not an absolute predictor of survival.
A study by Dr. Janet Harouse at the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center in New York City demonstrates that researchers should consider the combination of virus and monkey species they choose to study, rather than just the monkey species. The researchers compared the effects of intravenously administering the CCR5-tropic virus SHIVSF162P3 in pigtailed macaques and Indian rhesus. In the pigtailed macaques, peak viral load was 107-108 vRNA/mL and the set point varied greatly. All four pigtailed macaques showed moderate CD4+ cell declines in the peripheral blood, while CD4+ cell levels in the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) were not reported. In the Indian rhesus, peak viral load was 107 vRNA/mL and the set point varied between 102-106 vRNA/mL. Both infected Indian rhesus monkeys had a gradual drop in peripheral blood CD4+ cell levels and significant acute drops of GALT CD4+ cells. This GALT CD4+ cell depletion, as well as the changes in viral load and the pattern of opportunistic infections, is similar to what occurs in HIV-1 infection in humans. The researchers concluded that improving the efficiency of infection in the Indian rhesus model is an important goal.
Dr. Shiu-Lok Hu of the Washington NPRC in Seattle intravenously administered SHIV KU-1 to immunized and control pigtailed macaques. Plasma viral loads peaked and then were maintained at a high level. After 2 to 3 weeks of infection, a rapid and irreversible CD4+ cell depletion occurred. Some immunized animals were able to control their set point virus loads, although not their peak loads, and were able to maintain adequate CD4+ cell counts. The kinetics of the disease course did not appear to parallel that of HIV-1 infection in humans.
Presentation by Dr. Jon Warren, NIAID
A survey of studies published from 1999 to 2002 of live lentivirus (SIV, SHIV, HIV-1, HIV-2) challenges to vaccinated nonhuman primates indicates that most of the challenges are being done intravenously, despite the fact that lentiviruses ordinarily enter mucosally. Of the mucosal challenge studies, most have been conducted with Indian rhesus macaques and with SIV. More lentivirus challenge studies should be conducted using alternative macaque models, including Chinese rhesus, cynomolgus, and pigtailed macaques. Also, more challenge studies should be conducted with SHIV.
Because the number of HIV recombinants is growing and researchers cannot predict either their behavior or their virulence, more research should be conducted on the natural history of lentiviral infection in nonhuman primates, and the information should be stored in a shared database. NIAID's Division of AIDS is developing criteria to determine which animal models should be supported for long-term follow-up. Also, the division is considering establishment of a nonhuman primate lentiviral natural history database, which would supplement the HIV databases supported by the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.
Chinese rhesus macaques are potentially a useful alternative to Indian rhesus macaques. While Indian rhesus are in short supply and expensive, Chinese rhesus are available and less costly. Also, Chinese rhesus are susceptible to SIVmac and certain SHIVs, and reagents that have been used with Indian rhesus can be used with Chinese rhesus, since both are members of the same species. In addition, Indian rhesus may not provide the best model for human HIV infection, since AIDS develops much more rapidly in Indian rhesus than humans and the SIV plasma viral loads in Indian rhesus are as much as 1,000 times higher than the HIV loads in untreated humans.
Researchers have compared the results of SIVmac251 intravenous challenges in Indian rhesus, Chinese rhesus, and cynomolgus macaques. Results showed that the peaks of viral load were comparable in the three species, but the set points were lower in both Chinese rhesus and cynomolgus. Also, CD4+ T cell loss in the peripheral blood appeared to be less in Chinese rhesus and cynomolgus than Indian rhesus.
In a study involving intravenous challenge with SIVmac239, a molecular clone of SIVmac251, the viral load set points were again higher in Indian than Chinese rhesus. When comparing viral loads in the first 6 months of infection in both groups of SIVmac239-infected rhesus and HIV-1-infected humans, the researchers found that the virus load set points were more similar between Chinese rhesus and human patients than in the other two comparisons: Chinese versus Indian rhesus or Indian rhesus versus human patients. Also, CD4+ T cell count and CD4/CD8 T cell ratios in peripheral blood were higher in Chinese than Indian rhesus and more similar to those of human patients. Similarly, the strong anti-SIV antibody responses in Chinese rhesus were more similar to the strong anti-HIV antibody responses in HIV-infected patients than the practically nonexistent antibody responses in Indian rhesus. These findings imply that Chinese rhesus may provide more relevant models of human HIV infection than Indian rhesus.
In the intestinal mucosa, SIV primarily targets CCR5+ CD4+ T cells. In the SIVmac239 infection study, most of the intestinal CD4+ T cells died during early infection in Indian rhesus, while higher numbers of them survived in the intestinal mucosa of SIVmac239-infected Chinese rhesus. The numbers of surviving intestinal CD4+ T cells were inversely correlated with viral load.
In this study, three-quarters of the Indian rhesus were rapid progressors, developing AIDS 3 to 6 months postinfection. In contrast, none of the Chinese rhesus were rapid progressors, although one monkey developed AIDS-related B-cell lymphoma at 19 months.
Presentation by Dr. Marta Marthas, California NPRC
Variation within Indian or Chinese rhesus populations is as great as variation between these populations. The within-population variation can affect study results, particularly when a small number of subjects is used. This variation may partly explain differences between Dr. Marthas' study results and those cited by Dr. Warren.
Dr. Marthas' studies found no difference between Indian and Chinese rhesus in susceptibility to two different SIV viruses administered intravaginally. Few animals in either group were rapid progressors. In the animals that were not rapid progressors, antibody responses among Indian and Chinese rhesus were similar; however, titers among SIV-infected Chinese rhesus were more consistent (differing by up to 50-fold), whereas titers among infected Indian rhesus were more highly variable (in the 4,000-fold range).
While Dr. Marthas' experiments used intravaginal challenge, and those cited by Dr. Warren used the intravenous route, both sets of studies found that peak plasma SIV RNA levels were similar in Indian and Chinese rhesus, although the set points were lower in Chinese rhesus. Adding more animal subjects produced more variation--an effect also seen with human subjects.
Vaccination with an SIV vaccine provided some protection to the animals, as measured by plasma viral load and CD4/CD8 T cell ratio. Indian and Chinese rhesus did not differ in their response to the vaccine.
Vaccination studies have also been done in cynomolgus macaques, using a vaccine consisting of a Sabin polioviral vector carrying SIV genes. Cynomolgus macaques were used because they can be infected with Sabin poliovirus administered orally, while rhesus generally cannot. The vaccine provided some protection against SIVmac251 in the monkeys, as measured by viral load and changes in body weight. However, cellular immune response measurements were difficult to perform because of inverted CD4/CD8 ratios compared to rhesus, highly active and variable natural killer cells, and other factors.
Just as variation is seen in Indian and Chinese rhesus populations from different geographic locations, variation is likely in cynomolgus macaques from different locations.
Dr. Anita Trichel, University of Pittsburgh
Infection with SIV/DeltaB670, a primary isolate of SIV that consists of 12 variants, was initially studied in Indian and Chinese rhesus macaques. In Indian rhesus, virus load usually peaked at 106 viral copies/ml plasma within the first 2 weeks. From then on, the animals followed one of three patterns. About 20%, known as rapid progressors, did not live long enough to establish a set point but died after 2 to 3 months of infection. About 60%, known as intermediate progressors, established a set point between 104 and 105 viral copies/ml plasma and died within 1 to 3 years postinfection. A final 20%, known as slow progressors, established a set point of 103 viral copies/ml plasma and lived longer than 3 years postinfection.
A cohort of seven Chinese rhesus developed a peak virus load similar to Indian rhesus and established set points comparable to intermediate and slow progressors. One animal succumbed to fulminant Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia at 260 days, but six are still alive at greater than 570 days postinfection. Overall, Chinese rhesus survived significantly longer than Indian rhesus.
To determine whether the differential response to SIV/DeltaB670 in Indian and Chinese rhesus was due to differential amplification of one or more variants after inoculation, the researchers analyzed the variant composition in the inoculum and the monkeys. Analysis showed that the variants formed three groups. Group A variants were more virulent, Group B variants were more attenuated, and Group C variants were uncommon and probably of little consequence. The inoculum consisted of approximately 70% Group B and 30% Group A. Inoculated Indian rhesus had about equal amounts of Group A and B, while inoculated Chinese rhesus had 87% Group B and 13% Group A. These results suggest that Chinese rhesus were living longer postinfection because they had a less virulent mix of viruses. This longevity could be a problem in vaccine studies, because animals in the vaccine arm would have to survive about 1000 days or more to provide good data.
Because rhesus macaques were becoming difficult to obtain, the researchers began to use cynomolgus macaques (Macacca fascicularus), also known as long-tailed or crab-eating macaques. These monkeys live mostly on islands in Indonesia and Malaysia and are readily available at reasonable cost from a number of vendors. Also, they require less cage space than other monkeys because they rarely grow taller than 32 inches, and some researchers feel that they have a better disposition than rhesus.
Seven Indonesia cynomolgus macaques were obtained and a 100% infectious dose of SIV/DeltaB670 was administered intravaginally. All seven became infected.
Postinfection plasma viremia was compared in Indonesian cynomolgus macaques, Indian rhesus, and Chinese rhesus. No significant differences were found between Indonesian cynomolgus and Indian rhesus at 1, 2, and 8 weeks postinfection, although Indian rhesus had significantly higher plasma viremia than Chinese rhesus at 1 and 8 weeks postinfection.
In conclusion, cynomolgus macaques seem well-suited for studying many aspects of SIV infection, including intravaginal transmission. Some research teams have already begun to develop immunological assays for use in such studies.
Session 3: Alternative Old World Primate Models for Non-AIDS Research
Dr. Jay Kaplan, Wake Forest University
General Considerations. Cynomolgus macaques are genetically, physiologically, and behaviorally similar to rhesus macaques, although smaller in size, with adult males averaging 5 kg and females averaging 2.5 kg. Like rhesus, they routinely live more than 20 years. Even though cynomolgus macaques are from tropical regions, they survive reasonably well in laboratories located in temperate climates.
Cynomolgus macaques generally are infected with herpes B-virus but are less susceptible to tuberculosis than are rhesus macaques. Also, cynomolgus macaques absorb dietary cholesterol more easily than rhesus, vervets, baboons, and humans. Cynomolgus macaques from different geographic regions (Malaysia, Singapore, Philippine Islands, Indonesia) vary in a number of physiological measures and anatomical dimensions.
Availability and Cost. Large numbers of cynomolgus monkeys have been imported over the last few years, providing a ready resource for researchers and those wishing to stock breeding colonies. Current prices for this species range from $750 to $2,000, depending on age, sex, and origin. As with other primate species, the future availability from countries of origin is uncertain.
Research Areas/Models for Human Disease
Dr. William Morton, Washington National Primate Research Center
Most pigtailed macaques in this country originated from southern Sumatra, while others came from Kalimantan, or Borneo. Pigtails also live in Malaysia, Burma, Thailand, and Vietnam. They are omnivorous and weigh about the same as rhesus. Behaviorally, pigtailed macaques are somewhat more tractable than rhesus.
Pigtails in breeding colonies and in the wild have a high seroprevalence of herpes B-virus, but the Washington NPRC has produced several herpes B-negative colonies at its facilities at the Tulane NPRC. As with other macaque species, tuberculosis is also of concern with pigtailed macaques.
Availability. The Washington NPRC has the nation's largest supply of pigtailed macaques; the only other facility with significant numbers is the Yerkes NPRC. Only small colonies of pigtails exist elsewhere, and few are imported. If pigtails are to be used more in biomedical research, breeding colonies will need to be expanded.
Research Areas/Models of Human Disease
Dr. John VandeBerg, Southwest National Primate Research Center
The baboon is an appropriate alternative to rhesus macaques for certain kinds of non-AIDS research, and it may be a superior laboratory animal for certain types of studies. Macaques and baboons became evolutionarily separated from each other about 7 million years ago, which is the same duration of time that chimpanzees and humans have been evolving independently. The DNA sequences of macaques and baboons are about 98 to 99% identical; likewise, chimp and human DNA sequences are 98 to 99% identical. In addition, the karyotypes of macaque and baboons are identical; no chromosome rearrangements have occurred during the 7 million years the animals have independently evolved. Therefore, there is no innate genetic reason for choosing a macaque over a baboon for biomedical research.
Five subspecies of baboons are currently used in biomedical research in the United States: olive baboon, native to Tanzania and Kenya; red baboon, native to west Africa; yellow baboon from Tanzania; chacma baboon from South Africa; and hamadryas baboon, native to Ethiopia, Somalia, and the Arabian Peninsula. Because each subspecies has unique physiological characteristics, scientists must be aware of the type of baboon under study.
The olive baboon is the predominant subspecies at the Southwest NPRC, which also houses large numbers of yellow baboons. These two subspecies interbreed naturally in the wild, and they are closely related genetically.
Availability. Baboons are readily available from the Southwest NPRC and other sources. The Southwest center maintains about 3,800 baboons in a steady state; most were born at the center. In the last few years, the NPRC has been able to supply baboons to all US scientists who have requested the animals.
Baboon production could be enhanced with relative ease, if scientific demand should increase. It may also be possible to import additional animals from Africa, although air transportation is a primary obstacle. Additional funds would also be needed to house a larger number of baboons, construct necessary breeding facilities, and support any influx of animals.
Quick Facts
Advantages of Baboons in Biomedical Research
Disadvantages of Baboons in Biomedical Research
Research Areas/Models for Human Disease
Other research uses of baboons include immunogenicity testing, pharmacokinetics, somatic cell gene therapy, bone implants, disc replacement testing, and metabolic research.
Dr. Lynn Fairbanks, University of California, Los Angeles
The African green monkey, also known as the vervet, is found throughout sub-Saharan Africa, with populations in the Caribbean on the islands of St. Kitts, Nevis, and Barbados accidentally introduced during the slave trade in the 1600s.
Vervets are in the same subfamily as the macaques and baboons. They are similar to rhesus in anatomy, physiology, hematology, blood chemistry, and social organization. Female vervets reach puberty at 2 to 3 years of age, and adult size at 4. Males mature between 3 and 4 years of age and reach adult size at age 5. As adults, vervets are slightly smaller than rhesus and considerably smaller than baboons.
Female vervets have a slightly higher fecundity rate than rhesus. They typically produce one infant per year, although they are capable of producing three infants in 2 years. Females can begin producing infants at 3 years of age, but at that age they generally have pregnancy problems and a higher infant mortality rate compared with mothers 4 years of age and older. Gestation takes 165 days, and the mother-infant relationships are similar to rhesus and baboons.
Vervets of African origin carry natural pathogens, including the African green monkey variant of SIV (SIV-agm), Cercopithicine herpesvirus 2 (SA-8), and Marburg virus, which has killed laboratory workers in Europe. They are not carriers of herpes B-virus. In contrast, vervets of Caribbean origin are free of significant disease, including tuberculosis and hepatitis, and remain healthy in captivity.
Avaliability. Vervets are readily available for import from the Caribbean, where they are abundant and considered an agricultural pest. Research facilities that house and export vervets include the St. Kitts Biomedical Research Foundation, Caribbean Primate Research Laboratories, and Barbados Primate Research Center. Approximately 1,000 animals per year are available for export from Barbados, with the potential for similar numbers from St. Kitts.
In the United States, large colonies are located at the New Iberia Research Center (1,200) and at University of California, Los Angeles/Veterans Administration (UCLA/VA) Vervet Research Colony (550), while smaller numbers are housed at Wake Forest University and the University of Texas at Austin.
Advantages of Vervets as an Alternative to Rhesus
Research Areas/Models for Human Disease
Session 4: Alternative New World Primate Models for Non-AIDS Research
Christian R. Abee, University of South Alabama
Indigenous to Central and South America, New World Monkeys are not as closely related genetically to humans as are Old World monkeys. However, their genetic divergence creates biological characteristics that make New World monkeys uniquely suitable for studying certain human conditions, including infectious diseases like malaria.
Workshop participants focused on four types of New World monkeys that have been important to biomedical research: the squirrel monkey and owl monkey (family Cebidae), and the tamarin and marmoset (family Callitrichidae).
Availability. Prior to the mid-1980s, biomedical scientists in the United States could readily import New World monkeys, which were widely used to study malaria, behavior, and virus-induced cancers. However, most South American countries have since banned the export of nonhuman primates, and many of these animals have become nearly impossible to obtain in the United States. A few US breeding colonies produce New World monkeys--including squirrel monkeys and marmosets--but their availability to biomedical researchers remains very limited.
In general, workshop participants agreed that lack of availability has muted the demand for New World species in US biomedical research. However, increased supply of these animals could renew their study and enhance their usefulness as biomedical models, perhaps ultimately helping to alleviate demands for rhesus monkeys.
Care and Handling. New World monkeys require different care and husbandry than Old World monkeys, including an emphasis on routine and regular handling. The animals are easily stressed by environmental changes, leaving them vulnerable to disease. Improper handling has given New World monkeys a reputation as frail creatures in captivity; however, they are hardy if habituated to procedures and housed in suitable settings.
Advantages of New World Monkeys. Squirrel monkeys, owl monkeys, tamarins, and marmosets all share the following characteristics, which make them suitable for biomedical research:
Disadvantages of New World Monkeys. Among the potential drawbacks of using New World primates in biomedical research are:
Christian R. Abee, University of South Alabama
Squirrel Monkeys
Dr. Abee heads the NCRR-supported Squirrel Monkey Breeding and Research Resource, established in 1980 at the University of South Alabama in Mobile. The resource currently houses about 450 squirrel monkeys, making it the largest breeding colony of these animals in the United States.
Of the species of squirrel monkey used in biomedical studies, the Bolivian subspecies (Saimiri boliviensis boliviensis) is considered the best biomedical research model, and it is the type most prevalent at the Alabama resource. Only one species of squirrel monkey--Saimiri oerstedii--is considered to be endangered.
Before their exportation from South America was banned, squirrel monkeys were used extensively for biomedical research; about 3,000 animals per year were imported to the United States in the early 1980s. Today the primary US source for Bolivian squirrel monkeys is the Alabama resource.
Scientific Demand. In the last 3 years, about 1,400 papers published in peer-reviewed biomedical journals have cited use of the squirrel monkey. Dr. Abee suspects this number would increase dramatically if the animals were more readily available to scientists.
In the past 3 years, the Alabama resource has seen a doubling of formal requests for squirrel monkeys. Dr. Abee estimates that about 300 animals could easily be placed in biomedical studies each year, and demand would increase even more if the animals were more readily available. The squirrel monkey's relatively small body size makes it a practical model for drug studies. Pharmaceutical companies have long depended on squirrel monkeys for psychopharmacology and other research.
Availability. The Squirrel Monkey Breeding and Research Resource in Alabama records about 115 live births per year. But to maintain a self-sustained breeding colony, only about 60 to 70 of these animals can be harvested each year for biomedical studies.
Although the animals cannot be imported from South America, Dr. Abee has been working with the government of Bolivia to reach a collaborative arrangement that might overcome the ban on exportation. The primary obstacle, however, is funding limitations--both for development of a breeding colony in Bolivia and for expansion of US facilities to handle an influx of new animals.
Quick Facts
Research Areas/Models for Human Disease
Both the squirrel monkey and the owl monkey are unique animal models for malaria, since they are among the few animals that can be infected with human malarial parasites--including Plasmodium falciparum (which causes the most severe human malaria) and P. vivax (the most prevalent human malaria). In contrast, most other animals, including Old World primates, can only be infected with nonhuman malarial parasites that are specific to their species. Both squirrel and owl monkeys are therefore in great demand for malaria vaccine research. Some immunological reagents have been developed for such studies (e.g., markers for peripheral T-cells, assays), but they are less extensive and well-developed than those available for the rhesus macaque.
Owl Monkeys
The genus Aotus is found throughout the Amazon basin and the southern part of Central America. The most commonly used species in biomedical research is the Peruvian red-necked owl monkey (Aotis nancymae), about 300 of which are housed at the University of South Alabama primate center. It is one of the nation's largest colonies of owl monkeys.
Monogamous pairing of owl monkeys necessitates relatively large breeding colonies compared with other primate species. However, this drawback may be offset by the ability of female owl monkeys to get pregnant more than once per year.
Availability. Because export of these animals has been banned, owl monkeys are in extremely limited supply for biomedical research.
Quick Facts
Research Areas/Models of Human Disease
Suzette Tardiff, Southwest National Primate Research Center
Tamarins and marmosets are exceptionally small primates, ranging from the pygmy marmoset (Cebuella pygmaea: about 120-130 grams) to the lion tamarin (Leontopithecus rosalia: about 700 grams). They are the only simian primates that routinely produce more than one young at a time. Fetuses within a litter share a blood supply, making them hematopoietic chimeras--a characteristic that has proven useful in some areas of research. Recent research suggests that marmosets may be chimeric for somatic tissues beyond hematopoietic tissues. Such a finding has even more application for studying immunological tolerance and autoimmune diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, ulcerative colitis, and type 1 diabetes.
Quick Facts. Social groups. Marmosets and tamarins have a cooperative breeding system (older offspring and subordinate adults carry and care for the young of the dominant pair), so male-female pairs, families, and mixed-sex groups provide optimal captive groupings.
Advantages of Tamarins and Marmosets. Besides the advantages they share with other New World primates--including small size and lack of susceptibility to herpes B-viruses, the Callithrichidae family also offers the following benefits to biomedical research:
Research Areas/Models for Human Disease
Suzette Tardif, Southwest National Primate Research Center
Tamarins are indigenous to South America, ranging from southern Amazonia to Panama. Tamarin usually refers to two genera--Saguinus and Leontopithecus (lion tamarin), although the latter is endangered and plays no role in biomedical research. Saguinus includes more than a dozen species, but only four have been important to US biomedical research:
Availability. There is one remaining large colony of cotton-top tamarins in the United States, located at the NCRR-supported New England NPRC. Because this species is not available from other sources, Dr. Tardif suggests that it is important to continue to maintain this captive breeding colony. Although it may never again be widely used by biomedical researchers, studies of the cotton-top tamarin may offer unique insights into hepatitis C, colitis, and colon cancer.
Research Areas/Models for Human Disease. Saguinus was an important research primate from the 1960s to the early 1990s in the United States. Today, however, they are used primarily in only two research areas:
Comparison with Marmosets. Although the tamarin has a distinctive niche in biomedical research, Dr. Tardif suggests that the common marmoset is actually a more suitable animal model for biomedical studies. Common marmosets have better reproductive performance, they are better able to withstand variations in management and handling, they are more readily available, and they are not endangered.
David Abbott, Wisconsin National Primate Research Center
Marmosets are indigenous to Brazil. Marmoset usually refers to one genus, Callithrix, which includes nine species segregated into two groups:
Only one species, however, has been important to US biomedical research: the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). This species is native to the Atlantic coastal forests and scrub of northeastern Brazil.
The common marmoset has been widely used in Europe for biomedical research since the 1960s. Today, it is the primate of choice in European biomedical studies, in part because it is more widely available there and is less expensive to care for than the macaque. Although marmosets are not suitable for AIDS research and could not entirely replace the macaque, marmosets have characteristics that make them uniquely suited for particular areas of biomedical research.
Availability. Europe has several commercial suppliers, and several marmoset breeding facilities have recently been established in the United States.
Quick Facts
Advantages of Marmosets
Disadvantages of Marmosets
Research Areas/Models of Human Disease
Yet the marmoset offers a unique advantage for noninvasive imaging of primate brain function (e.g., functional MRI [fMRI] and micro-PET) because marmosets can be trained to sit still in the scanner without sedation. The small, enclosed space of a brain scanner resembles the marmoset's nest box, where they often fall asleep, and has allowed scientists to take functional brain images, using a 9.4 tesla fMRI scanner, on conscious male marmosets.
1Based on a workshop held April 19-20, 2002, at the National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
Prepared by the Research Resources Information Center, Equals Three Communications, 7910 Woodmont Avenue, Suite 200, Bethesda, MD 20814-3015.
3The complete Proceedings of this workshop, which were in final preparation when this issue went to press, are now available by contacting the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR), 500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001 (Tel: 202-334-2590; Email: ILAR@nas.edu)
Appendix 1. WORKSHOP SPEAKERS AND ATTENDEES
Workshop on Demands for Rhesus Monkey
in Biomedical Research
April 19-20, 2002
Washington, DC
Speakers
David H. Abbott, Ph.D.
Professor
Department of OB/GYN
Wisconsin National Primate Research Center
University of Wisconsin
Madison, WI
Christian R. Abee, D.V.M.
Professor and Chair
Department of Comparative Medicine
University of South Alabama
Mobile, AL
Lynn A. Fairbanks, Ph.D.
Professor
Neuropsychiatric Institute
University of California
Los Angeles, CA
Jay R. Kaplan, Ph.D.
Professor of Pathology and Anthropology
Department of Comparative Medicine
Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Winston-Salem, NC
Martha L. Marthas, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
California National Primate Research Center
Davis, CA
Bonnie Mathieson, Ph.D.
Office of AIDS Research
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD
William Morton, V.M.D.
Director
National Primate Research Center
University of Washington
Seattle, WA
Jerry A. Robinson, Ph.D.
Director
National Primate Research Centers Program
National Center for Research Resources
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD
Suzette D. Tardif, Ph.D.
Associate Director
Southwest National Primate Research Center
San Antonio, TX
Anita M. Trichel, D.V.M., Ph.D.
Research Assistant Professor
Department of Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, PA
John L. VandeBerg, Ph.D.
Scientific Director
Southwest National Primate Research Center
San Antonio, TX
Jon Warren, Ph.D.
Director
Innovation Grants Program
National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, MD
Attendees
Gary Baskin
Tulane National Primate Research Center
J. Gregory Beattie
Sierra Biomedical, Charles River Laboratories
Jack Bley
Pharmacia Kalamazoo, Michigan
Tom DeMarcus
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Richard Eberle
Oklahoma State University College of Veterinary Medicine
Gale Galland
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Gary Heckman
Oregon National Primate Research Center
Edmundo Kraiselburd
Caribbean Primate Research Center
Marta Leon-Monzon
Office of AIDS Research, NIH
Keith Mansfield
New England National Primate Research Center
Michael Murphy-Corb
University of Pittsburgh
Jason M. Mwenda
I.P.R., Kenya
Nancy Nadon
National Institute on Aging, NIH
Ray O'Neill
National Center for Research Resources, NIH
Barbara Perrone
National Center for Research Resources, NIH
Jeffrey Roberts
California National Primate Research Center
Pete Schultheiss
US Army, Department of Defense
Gary L. White
Oklahoma University Health Science Center
Sarah Williams-Blangero
Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research
Appendix 2. Workshop Agenda
Workshop on Demands for Rhesus Monkeys
in Biomedical Research
Friday, April 19, 2002
1:00 -- 1:15 p.m. Welcome and Charges to Participants
1:15 -- 2:00 Session 1: Rhesus Resource Needs, Availability, and Limitations
A. Overview of NCRR-supported Rhesus Resources, Dr. Jerry Robinson, NCRR US Rhesus Resources:
1) US Rhesus Resources
2) NIH Grantee NHP Utilization (NCRR Survey)
3) Current NCRR Activities To Address Macaque Shortages
B. Overview of Specific Monkey Needs for AIDS Research, Dr. Bonnie Mathieson, OAR
1) AIDS Vaccine Development
2) AIDS Pathogenesis
2:00 -- 3:00 Session 2: Alternative Nonhuman Primate Animal Models for AIDS Research
1) NIAID Workshop Summary, Dr. Jon Warren, NIAID
2) Indian versus Chinese Rhesus, Dr. Marta Martas, California NPRC
3) Cynomolgus Macaques, Dr. Anita Trichel, University of Pittsburgh
3:00 -- 3:15 Coffee Break
3:15 -- 5:15 Session 3: Alternative Old World Primate Models for Non-AIDS Research
1) Cynomolgus macaques, Dr. Jay Kaplan, Wake Forest University
2) Pigtailed macaques, Dr. William Morton, Washington NPRC
3) Baboons, Dr. John VandeBerg, Southwest NPRC
4) African Green Monkeys (Vervets), Dr. Lynn Fairbanks, UCLA
Saturday, April 20, 2002
7:30 -- 9:00 a.m. Session 4: Alternative New World Primate Models for Non-AIDS Research
1) Squirrel and Owl Monkeys, Dr. Chris Abee, University of South Alabama
2) Tamarins, Dr. Suzette Tardif, Southwest NPRC
3) Marmosets, Dr. David Abbott, Wisconsin NPRC
9:00 -- 9:10 Charges to Working Groups
9:15 -- 11:15 Working Group Sessions
11:15 -- 12:15 Reports with recommendations from the Working Groups
12:30 Adjourn
Copyright © 2008. National Academy of Sciences.
All rights reserved.
500 Fifth St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement